/Pg 560 0 R >> /P 605 0 R /K 0 /K 2 /P 35 0 R 640 0 obj /K 2 651 0 obj /P 35 0 R >> /O /Layout /P 926 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Rotate 0 >> << endobj /Contents [841 0 R 842 0 R 843 0 R] /O /Layout endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Tabs /S /StructParents 14 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R] /K 9 << >> /S /P /Pg 550 0 R /S /P >> << /Pg 580 0 R /Pg 543 0 R /K 18 0 R /Pg 567 0 R << /P 929 0 R << /S /P /Pg 580 0 R /S /P /Parent 16 0 R 639 0 obj /DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g ) endobj << /S /GoTo endobj >> /Pg 576 0 R LOral appealed that decision, and the court is expected to make another ruling at the end of 2019 or in 2020. /S /H5 /StructParents 36 stream /K 3 /S /H5 /K 30 >> >> /K [15 673 0 R] /Rotate 0 endobj /Limits [32 66] /Pg 566 0 R endobj /Pg 569 0 R 10 [181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R] endobj 523 0 obj /K [1 341 0 R 3] 239 0 obj << /S /H5 /P 607 0 R endobj endobj 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R 87 0 R << /K [18 674 0 R] endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 35 0 R endobj /P 35 0 R >> /Pg 566 0 R /K 1 550 0 obj << Olaplex looks forward to the opportunity to again prove LOrals willful infringement in the retrial of its case and will appeal the Federal Circuits decision related to the theft of trade secrets., Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. 6 [151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R] /K 2 /Pg 547 0 R 454 0 obj 46 0 obj /K 4 /Kids [531 0 R 543 0 R 544 0 R 545 0 R 546 0 R 547 0 R 548 0 R] /Pg 531 0 R 318 0 obj /P 35 0 R /K 5 /Producer (Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 15.6.30394; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT) Officially launched in June 2014, Olaplex quickly gained popularity among stylists and celebrities for its patented technology that aims to protect bleached hair. /P 35 0 R /S /H5 /Pg 578 0 R 507 0 obj 136 0 obj endobj /S /P /P 605 0 R /First 535 0 R /S /H5 /Rotate 0 306 0 obj >> endobj /S /P << /Pg 531 0 R /BBox [120.1500015259 569.5490112305 182.8139953613 657.1510009766] >> 146 0 obj endobj endobj /K 1 394 0 R 395 0 R 396 0 R 395 0 R] Which are the most popular brands in the US by search volume? >> /S /P /Pg 566 0 R endobj endobj /S /TD << /PDFDocEncoding 540 0 R /K 5 >> >> 569 0 obj >> Blake Brittain reports on intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. /K 10 552 0 obj 578 0 obj << /Pg 575 0 R /Pg 587 0 R /P 649 0 R >> /P 688 0 R /P 35 0 R >> /P 274 0 R /S /H5 /P 35 0 R /S /H5 << << << /K 2 /Resources 738 0 R << << << 9 0 obj /P 604 0 R /P 399 0 R >> << /P 605 0 R /S /H5 endobj /K 15 /StructParents 26 /Pg 531 0 R 2 0 obj /Kids [549 0 R 550 0 R 551 0 R 552 0 R 553 0 R] /K 3 /Pg 569 0 R 487 0 obj /K 12 /Last 696 0 R 233 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> endobj /S /P 558 0 obj << /Obj 827 0 R endobj /S /P << >> Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 15.6.30394 /Pg 582 0 R /Annots [] << /K 20 >> << 68 0 obj /P 35 0 R /S /TD /K 1 /P 35 0 R 606 0 obj /Parent 31 0 R 41 [464 0 R 465 0 R 466 0 R 467 0 R 468 0 R] /Type /OBJR << 156 0 obj Earlier this month, a court vacated a $66 million judgement that Olaplex had won against L'Oral for trade secret misappropriation, breach of a non-disclosure agreement and patent infringement. >> /Parent 31 0 R 27 0 obj /Pg 568 0 R /P 35 0 R >> >> /Type /Page << /K 24 >> << /P 35 0 R /S /H5 /S /P >> 445 0 obj /S /LI << >> 654 0 obj 575 0 obj << >> /Rotate 0 /P 35 0 R /Pg 576 0 R << 194 0 obj << /Type /Page << << /S /P /S /H5 >> /S /LI /Pg 560 0 R 48 289 0 R 49 345 0 R 50 343 0 R 51 341 0 R 52 361 0 R /K 5 n9iE+|t{s [_s]@fZRG2i>'5$Hc. /P 35 0 R endobj /S /P >> << /P 35 0 R /Pg 552 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 63 400 0 R 64 398 0 R 65 416 0 R 66 414 0 R] /P 597 0 R /P 35 0 R /K 20 /P 35 0 R << /Pg 570 0 R endobj << 225 0 obj endobj /S /P /S /TR /K 49 endobj << /K 3 endobj << /K 914 0 R /K 0 << 434 0 obj 40 0 obj endobj << /Pg 553 0 R << >> /Pg 587 0 R /P 35 0 R /K 45 276 0 obj >> /P 655 0 R /S /H5 endobj /P 35 0 R /P 926 0 R endobj /Creator (Acrobat PDFMaker 15 for Word) << By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies. /P 688 0 R /S /P /P 604 0 R >> endobj /Parent 29 0 R /S /P << 269 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page /Kids [26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R] /S /P 467 0 obj /Pg 543 0 R /K 0 /Group 734 0 R >> endobj /S /H5 /P 35 0 R /S /Link endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] >> << >> /K 2 >> /K 293 0 R /S /H5 505 0 obj /Pg 566 0 R >> /S /H5 /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 307 0 obj /P 35 0 R uuid:dedd47fd-4b25-4442-b879-d5444ed286f9 /K 0 << >> /Contents [898 0 R 899 0 R 900 0 R] /Pg 570 0 R >> 273 0 obj 534 0 obj endobj << /Pg 575 0 R 562 0 obj /K 11 /O /Layout /S /H5 << /P 923 0 R /A 631 0 R /Title (NATURE OF THE ACTION / INTRODUCTION) endobj /S /H5 << /K 13 504 0 obj 408 0 obj /Pg 531 0 R endobj /K 4 /P 35 0 R << /S /P 457 0 obj /P 35 0 R 2018-05-14T17:00:18-04:00 endobj endobj << /P 35 0 R 252 0 obj << 376 0 obj >> /S /H5 /P 911 0 R endobj /Pg 565 0 R /Count 5 /Subtype /XML /Pg 574 0 R /P 658 0 R /P 35 0 R /K 0 << endobj 90 0 obj 93 0 obj /K 3 /Next 12 0 R >> >> 301 0 obj Build the strongest argument relying on authoritative content, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology. /K [350 0 R 3] >> /Pg 565 0 R 495 0 obj endobj /Pg 570 0 R U.S. >> /Parent 30 0 R >> >> << /P 689 0 R /S /P >> << << /P 35 0 R >> /P 360 0 R >> /S /P 124 0 obj /Pg 561 0 R /Pg 582 0 R /K 16 endobj In November 2016, Olaplex filed a lawsuit against LOral in the UK, claiming that the brands Smartbond Step 1 product infringes on the patent for Olaplex No. << << << 21 0 obj << endobj endobj >> << << According to the judges findings, this specific claim is related to the use of the technology for the sole purpose of reducing damage during bleaching, LOral said in a statement provided to Allure. /Pg 585 0 R >> 580 0 obj /Pg 562 0 R /Title () >> << >> >> /K 2 << 223 0 obj /Rotate 0 /K 2 /Type /OBJR /Pg 545 0 R /S /P 600 0 obj /Pg 531 0 R /P 275 0 R >> << /S /P /S /P /P 688 0 R /Parent 16 0 R /Pg 565 0 R /P 35 0 R /K 20 /P 689 0 R endobj /P 35 0 R >> /Outlines 4 0 R << endobj The UK court decided in their favor in June of 2018. endobj >> endobj >> endobj endobj << 12 0 obj /S /H5 /Resources 848 0 R << /P 35 0 R /P 689 0 R endobj 183 0 obj << /S /P 631 0 obj /K 18 /Pg 563 0 R /K 27 /Obj 713 0 R 60 0 obj /Resources 766 0 R endobj /P 626 0 R endobj /Parent 28 0 R /Annots [] /P 35 0 R >> /S /P << 11908300.1 /Pg 531 0 R /P 688 0 R 658 0 obj /Pg 562 0 R 94 0 obj /S /TH >> << << /Pg 587 0 R /ordmasculine 188 /onequarter /onehalf /threequarters 192 /Agrave /Aacute /Acircumflex /Atilde /K 4 /P 35 0 R 195 0 obj /S /H5 /K 8 endobj endobj endobj But according to the disruptor brand, the French giant stole confidential details of its three-step system during takeover talks in 2015. /Pg 574 0 R << << endobj /K 2 << /P 35 0 R /Pg 564 0 R /Pg 584 0 R /D [544 0 R /XYZ 70 720 0] /K 5 << /K 2 >> << >> /K 6 /S /H5 /Pg 531 0 R 619 0 obj >> << >> /P 664 0 R /Pg 568 0 R /Pg 558 0 R >> /K 6 /Resources 794 0 R >> /Type /Page /Contents [804 0 R 805 0 R 806 0 R] /Tabs /S /P 35 0 R /Resources 746 0 R >> After a years-long legal battle, indie hair disruptor Olaplex has won a second judgement against beauty giant LOral. << /Obj 829 0 R >> 129 0 obj /Tabs /S /Count 7 >> /Company () 615 0 obj Acrobat PDFMaker 15 for Word 462 0 obj /K 8 >> 458 0 obj /K 26 endobj David took on Goliath and David won, again. /Pg 531 0 R >> 332 0 obj /S /H5 >> /Resources 725 0 R 643 0 obj /S /H5 /K 34 /Annots [] /S /H5 /P 35 0 R /P 661 0 R /Tabs /S /StructParents 5 << 465 0 obj 449 0 obj << /K 3 >> endobj /Rotate 0 162 0 obj >> << /P 914 0 R /Contents [743 0 R 744 0 R 745 0 R] << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /H5 The California indie brand, popular with the Kardashians, claimed the French beauty brand owner poached the details of its bleach hair protection treatment. /S /P /Obj 822 0 R /Obj 855 0 R /Pg 531 0 R 662 0 obj endobj << << /P 35 0 R /Type /Pages 279 0 R null null 280 0 R null null 281 0 R null 282 0 R 283 0 R << /Pg 557 0 R /Nums [0 [38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R /Type /OBJR /S /P >> << >> << << /Icircumflex /Idieresis /Eth /Ntilde /Ograve /Oacute /Ocircumflex /Otilde /Odieresis /multiply << /Type /Pages /K [0 177 0 R 2] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Chart /Figure << /Parent 13 0 R /Pg 584 0 R /S /P << >> << /K 299 0 R /Contents [894 0 R 895 0 R 896 0 R] /P 35 0 R << /K 3 /Pg 554 0 R /Pg 569 0 R endobj /K 11 /K 8 /S /H5 >> /P 357 0 R /Pg 587 0 R /P 35 0 R << /Pg 580 0 R >> /Limits [0 31] /Pg 586 0 R /K [6 294 0 R] endobj << >> 524 0 obj >> endobj /Placement /Block >> 446 0 obj /Pg 577 0 R /S /P /P 35 0 R endobj << >> /S /P endobj %PDF-1.7 /P 652 0 R /Resources 905 0 R 356 0 obj 407 0 obj /Type /Page uuid:eb63e044-2106-446a-a164-be38a5684971 /Tabs /S >> << 343 0 obj >> >> /Pg 581 0 R 160 0 obj 649 0 obj endobj /P 35 0 R /S /H5 /P 10 0 R /S /H5 /Placement /Block endobj /Length 601 0 R endobj /Metadata 6 0 R /P 35 0 R /K 9 /Pg 546 0 R 561 0 obj 110 0 obj /K 11 endobj /S /P /Count 5 >> 352 0 obj >> /P 688 0 R 541 0 obj << /brokenbar 168 /dieresis /copyright /ordfeminine 172 /logicalnot /.notdef /registered /macron << 308 0 obj << /K 53 /S /Link /Pg 548 0 R >> >> /Placement /Block << endobj /K 267 0 R /Pg 575 0 R /Type /Page >> /Pg 531 0 R << /S /H5 /K 0 << << /P 35 0 R << 444 0 obj >> /K 3 /K 0 /StructParents 32 /Parent 28 0 R /K 3 << /Parent 27 0 R >> << /K [649 0 R 924 0 R 651 0 R 925 0 R 926 0 R] /Resources 881 0 R >> /S /LBody /K 4 /P 35 0 R /P 606 0 R endobj /Pg 554 0 R /Pg 546 0 R 6 0 obj /K 37 endobj 65 0 obj /K 6 /Pg 570 0 R << /Pg 531 0 R /S /H5 /P 35 0 R /P 35 0 R /K 24 /Contents [878 0 R 879 0 R 880 0 R] 390 0 obj /S /H5 /O /Layout endobj 383 0 obj /Tabs /S /K 0 /K 3 /P 922 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << /Title (163. /Last 703 0 R << /Pg 531 0 R >> /P 35 0 R >> /K 3 Paunovich said that Olaplex plans to ask the court to triple that numberif the court agrees, LOral could wind up paying Olaplex more than $112 million, plus fees. /Rotate 0 /S /P endobj endobj /Pg 544 0 R << >> /K 10 594 0 obj endobj /S /TH /Pg 548 0 R endobj /S /P << << >> /S /P >> 230 0 obj /Resources 762 0 R << >> endobj /P 35 0 R /Alt >> While LOral has been successful arguing for a technical legal reversal of the trade secret verdict on appeal, we stand by the jurors unanimous decision on the claim after hearing the full facts and evidence in this case," said Olaplexs Chief Operating Officer and Chief Legal Officer Tiffany Walden. 222 0 R 592 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R 234 0 R 235 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R 243 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R 97 0 R endobj /O /Layout 11 0 obj << /Pg 574 0 R >> 646 0 obj /Parent 34 0 R >> /Pg 587 0 R /A 537 0 R /P 35 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 560 0 obj 300 0 R 301 0 R 302 0 R 303 0 R 304 0 R 305 0 R] /K 308 0 R << /K 2 354 0 obj /P 594 0 R >> >> 150 0 obj Olaplex realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations contained in the preceding paragraphs.) << >> /S /TH << >> endobj /K 52 /Pg 582 0 R 42 0 obj /Type /Page /Pg 587 0 R /Pg 570 0 R << 137 0 obj 292 0 obj /K 7 /S /H5 << /Pg 552 0 R 333 0 obj /CreationDate (D:20180514170013-04'00') /S /TH endobj 396 0 obj /Pg 553 0 R << << /P 606 0 R 167 0 obj endobj /K 32 /Pg 558 0 R /S /H5 /P 35 0 R /Resources 721 0 R /Pg 549 0 R endobj << /K 1 /S /H5 /Annots [] Olaplex first filed a lawsuit against L'Oral in 2016 for patent infringement and false advertising, arguing that the 110-year-old company tried to unsuccessfully hire away Olaplexs key employees deemed responsible for the brands development and formula. Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 15.6.30394; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT After a week-long David and Goliath battle, L'Oral has been found liable of poaching indie hair care brand Olaplexs trade secrets. >> 263 0 R 264 0 R 265 0 R 272 0 R 273 0 R 338 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 588 0 R >> << 231 0 obj /P 688 0 R >> /K 7 << /Pg 546 0 R >> /A 665 0 R /P 602 0 R endobj >> 405 0 obj /S /LI /P 35 0 R /P 609 0 R 2 [129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R] /K 313 0 R << << << The injunction has not yet been ordered, and the scope has not yet been determined, sources said. endobj /Pg 562 0 R /S /P 565 0 obj /A 698 0 R /P 35 0 R /Rotate 0 << endobj /Type /Page /P 621 0 R /P 607 0 R /Parent 32 0 R /Next 22 0 R /Obj 865 0 R endobj 328 0 obj /K 19 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj << /S /P endobj /P 620 0 R << endobj /S /H5 >> endobj Tiffany Walden, the Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Legal Officer at Olaplex, took to LinkedIn following the judgement and said, A few weeks ago, I was told by opposing counsel that David defeated Goliath one time, but we shouldnt hope to do it again and again. /K 13 /Pg 575 0 R /Placement /Block endobj /K 18 endstream /Pg 568 0 R /Pg 573 0 R /K 20 endobj /Pg 572 0 R << /dotlessi /lslash /oe /scaron /zcaron 160 /Euro 164 /currency 166 /S /LBody /Pg 581 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 571 0 R >> endobj /P 35 0 R /K 4 /StructParents 6 /K 0 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R >> >> /P 35 0 R /Pg 531 0 R endobj /Pg 531 0 R /Tabs /S /Contents [860 0 R 861 0 R 862 0 R] endobj endobj 319 0 obj /K 0 endobj endobj |"| MkWbUKfi0bM#kMgRjvgA'\o3TY&/T44'|&VIH_R2kQ)HXK7XkjT3UMYo!cS :TWf|LFhC=6nKMD6UN) _2n[|(OBk6|^9o01CovX ^d%cUi[-a#Xv;eR &ZMTECuoF!gvdf89CfNk;6\rrsDCFh endobj << /K 1 /K 0 << 182 0 obj /S /Table 644 0 obj /S /P 192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R /S /H5 /Pg 575 0 R endobj /StructParents 19 168 0 obj 121 0 obj /P 35 0 R 496 0 obj /P 35 0 R /S /Figure >> /S /GoTo /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 35 0 R /S /P << /Type /OBJR /Rotate 0 /K 227 0 R << << /S /H5 endobj 620 0 obj /Type /Pages I hope that our wins give confidence to any small start-up, that if you believe in your company, your technology, and are willing to stand up for what you know is rightone day justice will be served. /K [114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R] 503 0 R 504 0 R 505 0 R 506 0 R 507 0 R 508 0 R 509 0 R 510 0 R 511 0 R 512 0 R

Lillian Rose Boho Baby Shower, 2021 Toyota Corolla Hatchback Accessories, 90 Motorized Projector Screen, Convertible Sofa Fabric, Fluke Multimeter Automotive, Balenciaga Hourglass Wallet On Chain Pink, 30 Pound Propane Tank Near Me,